Programmer Humor

32060 readers

1704 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

623

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] words_number 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you could even get rid of the iter() and the collect() since it's a small fixed size array.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yep [T;N] has a direct implementation of map. "{:?}" is necessary because arrays aren't Display but you could get around that by saying

["1", "not a number", "3"].map(|n| println!("{}", n.parse().unwrap_or(0)));

but now I'm golfing. Also

for n in ["1", "not a number", "3"] {
   println!("{}", n.parse().unwrap_or(0))
}

is more idiomatic I shouldn't let my Haskell get the better of me. That does use Iterator, not that it makes a difference here.