this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
164 points (93.2% liked)

World News

38705 readers
6 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Blasphemy and racism are two very different things.

Blasphemy is a human right.

Besides, there are already laws against hate speech.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Different issue. I'm not debating categories of speech. I'm saying that speech that expresses no ideas but that is significantly hateful to a group of people shouldn't be protected. There are trade offs here: offensive speech that expresses political ideas (beyond "we hate you") is worthwhile and should be balanced against offense it may cause. I know this isn't a nice simple black and white answer but I think the real world isn't nice a simple. There are shades of grey. Other countries might weigh the tradeoffs differently and that's fine. Doesn't make this decision wrong, just that the tradeoffs are weighed differently to your intuitions

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a nice word salad to say you support blasphemy laws.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What rules does your skydaddy support?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm an atheist and you appear incapable of listening.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you unambiguously said you support a blasphemy law, but somehow you don't support blasphemy laws? Wake up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wtf are you talking about? Show me where I "unambiguously said [I] support a blasphemy law"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am sorry you are overally sensitive to your skydaddy being insulted

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blasphemy the Holy Ghost then deny the existence of Allah and prove it please. As an atheist you should have zero problems committing the unforgivable sins of the Abrahamic faiths.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh FFS I'm not jumping through tour stupid hoops. Clearly not capable of a good faith discussion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone check out the totally real not fake atheist here!

I knew it btw, I knew that anyone advocating cowardly appeasement would have to be afraid of a skydaddy and was so lacking in courage they would even lie.about their beliefs. When the going gets slightly tough we know who hides. Maybe pray harder next time and the zombie-jew will save you ;)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You're an idiot. I feel genuinely sad for you.