this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
7 points (73.3% liked)
Privacy
31886 readers
483 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you want an open source walkie talkie functionality, you can use signal, or even simple x, and send voice messages. Boom walkie-talkie
There are products built on top of Mumble, which is a voice conferencing software, which is open source.
https://github.com/Theofilos-Chamalis/EVO-PTT
The client is open, but they use a proprietary server, which is just mumble
If you want to host your own Mumble server, you can use a more open client that's not tied to a commercial server... Like https://mumla-app.gitlab.io/
....
Being hostile towards people giving you good advice, is not a great way to get good advice in the future. The reason people are telling you about the benefits of open source software, it's impossible to vet or prove any privacy claims with closed source software. They could be lying, people lie all the time.
Thank you for the suggestions, I will be sure to check them out.
Also, my intention was not to be hostile. I made that comment out of the facts the other comments that were made at that time presented, in which were saying the pros of FOSS, and Zello should not be trusted because of it's closed-source nature. Somewhere in there my tone must have gotten misinterpreted.
Again, I apologize to anyone who read my comments as an act of hostility, as that was not my intention.