this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
946 points (98.1% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
4 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, well, as you said: it's probably fixed by now, but I used to have a universal su that would work on any armv7 linux (so basically every phone back then, but also on my armv7 little laptop I had at the time...) with which I was able to easily root any phone by putting it in /data/local and making it bootable, then using full path to move any Android root files in place (though I did also just copy that su itself to /system/bin for root on cheaper phones sometimes, which is just playing with fire as it basically makes any root action unseen and allowed. ๐Ÿ˜‚). That did work for years though, but that's probably cause Android minimizes the linux and never actually updated the kernel so much, and the laptop's flashed OS was something altered with also very little updates. And ARM was still quite new to the public too. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

I remember I came across it in the rooting package for my Kindle Fire and only found out it could do that by accident,... ๐Ÿ˜… It couldn't change user, though, it had only 1 use without parameters, which resulted as if you do a 'sudo su' if you remove the sudo password-requirement.

Hence why I used the example. I wasn't being limitative to it, though. There's so many things that could screw you if it has a vulnerability, if it happens I very much doubt it'll be through nano, though.