246
Biden ‘not sure he’d be running’ in 2024 if Trump wasn’t: ‘We cannot let him win’
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
246 points (94.6% liked)
News
23014 readers
9 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Democracy involved compromise, unless you just wanted to be defeated in detail in the political arena. You may wish that boomers and their views didn't exist, but for as long as they do, they are a reality that needs to be faced.
If you just ignore them and push them towards the repub candidates, then it isn't progressives that win, but republicans. Who can then do away with democracy at some point and secure their position despite dwindling demographics, in classic Realpolitik fashion.
Gramps may not get all the nuances of the modern world, I doubt any 80+ yr old does, regardless of how good their briefings are. But he does understand why moderates are important. And he's good at diplomacy in general.
Yes the system sucks. This is not news to anyone already past their teenage years. It's what we got though, and to reform it, you need progressive politicians, which will need moderates in order to win vs entrenched repubs. Reality is a bitch, and it doesn't treat purity very well.
Hate to tell y'all this but there are large groups of Millennials that share the same views as the boomers everyone whines about.
The reason the Republicans have been in charge isn't because of any large chunk of the populace supporting them, it is because a very significant chunk does not Vote.
Well, that and gerrymandering…
gerrymandering is a means to manage those that Vote and moves the Electorate a tiny fraction which only works because so few Vote.
Hate to tell you this, the party's singular contempt for younger voters has caused them to look elsewhere.
enjoy coup2. I'm sure you'll get along great with the Fascists being so pure and superior.
I'm describing the results of the party not taking younger voters seriously.
As always, you're pulling the "everyone to my left is all the way to my right" shit that centrists pull whenever someone points out that their messaging is garbage.
When was the last time centrists compromised with anyone to their left? All I see is centrists collaborating with the right.
This right here. The DNC always fights hard against the left and when negotiating with the fascists, they start from a barely acceptable compromise (at best) and give tons of concessions from there.
And then demand praise from progressives for the "compromise" that is capitulation in all but name.
Absolutely. Their (DNC leadership) policy objectives might be a lot better (in theory, if not always in practice) than those of the fascists, but they're lying corporately owned demagogues most of the time all the same.
Older generations have a role in it but let's not forget one thing, a whole lot of people much younger than the boomer generation also support the right, the boomers present at the Capitol on January 6th 2021 were the politicians, not the terrorists. The 18-35 y.o. crowd is extremely politically divided, probably more than any of the previous generations currently living.
This is why we have to meet each other, not as public faces talking to audiences, but where people are, where they go to talk about these things when they're in the mood. As people just like them, maybe even that know how they feel and can still listen. It's not like their foundational complaints aren't legitimate.
Places like right here. Or better yet, the structure of the Fediverse as a whole, in a more systemic way. But that's long term goals, that won't be ready in time.
We have a real outside enemy now, though. Few of em. They've just been pursuing a divide-and-conquer strategy on us, and even began to see results. There's not a whole lot of counters to that strategy, it's one of the most tested and effective in all of history. There's a few though.
Democracy never involves compromise for the rich.