this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
468 points (95.2% liked)

News

23014 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A mother and her 14-year-old daughter are advocating for better protections for victims after AI-generated nude images of the teen and other female classmates were circulated at a high school in New Jersey.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, officials are investigating an incident involving a teenage boy who allegedly used artificial intelligence to create and distribute similar images of other students – also teen girls - that attend a high school in suburban Seattle, Washington.

The disturbing cases have put a spotlight yet again on explicit AI-generated material that overwhelmingly harms women and children and is booming online at an unprecedented rate. According to an analysis by independent researcher Genevieve Oh that was shared with The Associated Press, more than 143,000 new deepfake videos were posted online this year, which surpasses every other year combined.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)

Not a lawyer, but 99% sure it's the same here in Canada as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Australia too. Hentai showing underage people is illegal here. From my understanding it's all a little grey depending on the state and whether the laws are enforced, but if it's about victimisation the law will be pretty clear.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Absolutely absurd. Criminalizing drawings is the stupidest thing in the world.

This case should already be illegal under harassment or similar laws. There's no reason to make drawings illegal

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nah dude, I am perfectly cool with animated depictions of child sexual exploitation being in the same category as regualr child exploitation regardless of the fact that she's actually a 10,000 old midget elf or whatever paper thin explanation they provide not to be considered paedos.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well that's just absurd and you should rethink your position using logic rather than emotion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"that's just absurd"

Well that's an emotional response that includes no specifics or appeals to logic.

"rethink your position using logic rather than emotion"

Lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well that’s an emotional response that includes no specifics or appeals to logic.

You clearly have no logic so I'm not going to appeal to it. Just a general comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am shocked to my core that you would write off an observation as having no logic. Shocked I tell you!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I am perfectly cool with animated depictions of child sexual exploitation being in the same category as regualr child exploitation regardless

Not an observation. You're saying you don't care about actual victims, children actually being abused. Real, live victims. That's not worse than someone drawing some pictures you don't like?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wow, you got me. That's totally what I am saying that you had to fabricate a quote that represents the argument you want to have.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fabricate a quote? I literally quoted the start of the thread.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Misattribute then? My only position was that your rebuttal was not logical while asking for logic, which I thought was funny and "absurd" as you put it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

First of all I didn't say any of things you're inferring from the quote you posted.

But yes, I think sexually exploitative imagery of children is just as vile and disgusting as behavior that directly harms children and very indicative of someone who may attempt to harm a child in the future.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)