Technology

34906 readers

236 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Should AI images be copyrightable? (beehaw.org)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've heard arguments for both sides and i think it's more complicated then simply yes or no. what do you guys think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Judges have ruled that they can't be copyrighted because of this lack of a true author, and I agree.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fairly sure that was a case where the guy wanted to give the copyright to the ai algorithm itself and not about the copyrightability of the art. Specifically, he wanted them to be copyrighted as "as a work-for-hire to the owner of the Creativity Machine" - creativity machine is the name of the algorithm. Basically just a modern version of the monkey selfie kerfuffle.