this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
913 points (98.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5478 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (4 children)

No, it's not possible to take a 3D surface and to transpose it onto a 2D plane without any distortion.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

This is true. There are some projections that show area more accurately, or shape of landmasses, etc.

For example:

Many map projections do one thing well at the cost of sacrificing others. For example, the popular Mercator projection (which you'll see in many US schools and textbooks) is well suited for marine navigation but is exceptionally distorted the closer you get to the poles.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I kinda like how the Kavrayskiy VII projection looks. It appears to preserve both the area and the shape fairly well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

this kind of projection is my favourite, it just looks like a map that belongs on a wall

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

is well suited for marine navigation but is exceptionally distorted the closer you get to the poles.

Which makes perfect sense for its use case - navigating from Belgium, Portugal and Spain to Africa, India and Central and South America.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can easily do it without distortion. The issue is continuity. You'd have to make cuts and effectively unwraped the globe like you would a 3D sphere. Some countries might literally be cut in half, but it would at least be accurate

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There will still be distortion, just less. The more cuts, the less distortion. But you can't make an unwrapped sphere lay perfectly flat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Erm, yes you can, just run it through the infinite-cuts device!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Or without chopping it up in an odd way rather than a rectangle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My fucking..

UV MAPS

AGGGGGHHHHH