Linux

48365 readers

1387 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

437

PipeWire 1.0 Released For Managing Audio/Video Steams On The Linux Desktop (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I've been using PipeWire this year on my Void Linux laptop & desktop. It's been mostly OK but has a few problems. For years I have been using plain ALSA (with no custom configuration) because pulseaudio causes me regular issues across multiple machines (mostly silently failing).

Pros:

I don't have to use Chromium for my mic to work on online video conf (WTF Firefox)
"EasyEffects" lets me quickly fix crappy youtube audio (bad gain normalisation, way too much sibilance) with a minimum of effort.

Cons:

Sometimes breaks all audio until I manually restart it (hey, just like pulseaudio. This problem never happens when using ALSA straight)
First time setup is complicated, involving environment variables, dbus user session buses and multiple daemons (running just pipewire isn't enough). Why can't it handle this all itself? Surely it should notice if these things are missing and just fix it itself? Compare this to straight ALSA where you (1) do nothing and then (2) everything works (except Firefox mic support)
I can't have multiple audio outputs all unmuted at the same time. Eg my headphone output and my rear speaker output. If I override this (using alsamixer) then it gets forgotten next boot anyway, it seems to be out of scope of PipeWire's understanding.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[+] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't think honestly he gets enough credit.

If you check SystemD, its a HUGE step up, which is why everyone is using it now (whereas, the old scripts had race conditions, were a pain to write and other issues). Anyone who has written both can tell you how much better things are now..

The fact this issue is happening on both Pipewire and Pulseaudio also suggests it's more likely a bug in the drivers.. It might not be obvious on ALSA directly, but that doesn't mean an issue doesn't exist there..

And honestly, the situation before PulseAudio was awful. Audio not working was a common issue, and low latency audio was the least of anyone's problems. Whereas, these days, because of Pulseaudio, even gaming is a thing now (back then, I even saw issues on tuxracer, and Unreal tournament back in the days).

In regards to setup, most distributions will handle that anyway I'm guessing. So not sure why the configuration process should matter unless you're in Arch or Slackware? As long as the distribution handles it, it shouldn't matter. It'd really a non-issue honestly.

I do a lot of middleware development and we're regularly blamed by users for bugs/problems upstream too (which is why we've now added a huge amount of enduser diagnostics/metrics in our products which has made it more obvious the issues aren't related to us). In practice, very few people have issues with Pulseaudio (I haven't seen issues since launch). Sometimes as well, keep in mind it can be the sound interface (especially if its USB)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fact this issue is happening on both Pipewire and Pulseaudio also suggests it’s more likely a bug in the drivers… It might not be obvious on ALSA directly, but that doesn’t mean an issue doesn’t exist there…

I probably made the overlap unclear, sorry:

Pipewire issues: My 2023 desktop and 2016 laptop, very different hardware.
Pulseaudio issues: All of my pre-2023 desktops and several family laptops

I do a lot of middleware development and we’re regularly blamed by users for bugs/problems upstream too (which is why we’ve now added a huge amount of enduser diagnostics/metrics in our products which has made it more obvious the issues aren’t related to us).

Eep, that's annoying. You also probably don't have direct interaction with the users most of the time (they're not your customer) which makes this worse, people in a vacuum follow each other's stories.

In practice, very few people have issues with Pulseaudio (I haven’t seen issues since launch). Sometimes as well, keep in mind it can be the sound interface (especially if its USB)

There might be a bias here because these problems are not persistent, ie a reboot fixes them.

In regards to setup, most distributions will handle that anyway I’m guessing. So not sure why the configuration process should matter unless you’re in Arch or Slackware? As long as the distribution handles it, it shouldn’t matter. It’d really a non-issue honestly.

That's potentially more things different distros can do differently and more issues your middleware will start getting blamed for.

Yes it's not a problem for user-friendly distros, but why does the user friendliness problem exist anywhere anyway? It's better to fix problems upstream, not downstream.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you check SystemD, its a HUGE step up, which is why everyone is using it now

I think that's a "winners write history" situation. There were other options at the time that might have been better choices. Everyone uses it now because of Redhat and Debian being upstream to most users, desktop and corporate. I was not surprised by Redhat adopting it (it's their own product) but Debian was quite the shock.

Yes systemd is definitely a step up from traditional initscripts (oh god). In terms of simplicity, reliability and ease of configuration however it's a step below other options (like runit). I don't have distro management experience but, given the problems I've encountered with different init systems over the years, I suspect there would be less of a maintenance burden with the other options.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm very curious about the downvotes to this one. May I ask people's thoughts? Perhaps I'm too vague? I can put a bigger story about my experiences with various init systems in production & research if people are interested.