this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
218 points (98.2% liked)

News

23014 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court on Tuesday struck down Maryland’s handgun licensing law, finding that its requirements, which include submitting fingerprints for a background check and taking a four-hour firearms safety course, are unconstitutionally restrictive.

In a 2-1 ruling, judges on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond said they considered the case in light of a U.S. Supreme Court decision last year that “effected a sea change in Second Amendment law.”

The underlying lawsuit was filed in 2016 as a challenge to a Maryland law requiring people to obtain a special license before purchasing a handgun. The law, which was passed in 2013 in the aftermath of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, laid out a series of necessary steps for would-be gun purchasers: completing four hours of safety training that includes firing one live round, submitting fingerprints and passing a background check, being 21 and residing in Maryland.

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, a Democrat, said he was disappointed in the circuit court’s ruling and will “continue to fight for this law.” He said his administration is reviewing the ruling and considering its options.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Source? Pre '64 there wasn't even mandated serialization of commerical sold firearms so a registration system would have been difficult to implement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Literally none of what that opinion piece says shows any laws. The first one being registration...it wasn't gun registration it was basically a draft registration. You posted up some opinion piece from an anti gun nut and said "see it's true"... what's worse is dude uses his own book as a source...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

You literally had to hand in your guns when you came into town. Don't need numbers when the sheriff is keeping them in a safe with ownership tags on them.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

https://theconversation.com/five-types-of-gun-laws-the-founding-fathers-loved-85364

Not difficult at all since there were a lot fewer people and most people knew each other. Because the militia was supposed to be our main defense, being a part of it meant your guns had to be inspected to be well-regulated.

We did quickly move away from the militia focused model though when there was a big loss against Natives due to terribly coordinated militias.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That law is about ensuring the militia's guns were of adequate quality to fight. If they came to your house and found you didn't have a good fighting gun at hand you'd get in trouble. I'm not sure that's the parallel you want it to be.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

It's exactly the parallel it should be. Because there is no militia anymore. That doesn't mean you ignore half the amendment. It means no one qualifies for the second amendment anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Did you actually read your "source"? The article claims a lot but offers no substantiation to many of the claims.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

And after we moved away from militias, people stopped acting like the 2nd amendment applies to anything, right? If a militia isn't required anymore, the basis for the 2nd amendment is gone, so it doesn't apply.

I wish logic was used by people more often...