this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
147 points (87.3% liked)

News

22896 readers
5918 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Netherlands here: I had no idea the US has 30 year fixed rates. That is insane. Our housing market is fucked and rates are only locked for 10 to 15 years these days.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's awesome knowing my payment won't change aside from maybe a bit more each year due to any potential tax increase!

How do you not panic realizing interest rates are rocketing and you'll be priced out of your own home and you can see it coming and there's nothing you can do???

What a shit system that must feel like.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's crazy in the UK too, where 3-5 year fixes are common. I've know folk who at renewal next year will be paying £500-£800 extra, each month.

My biggest impact has been gas and elec, which maybe added that amount to my annual bill. I can't imagine the stress.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Timing worked really well for us. Finished a 5 year term just before the larger rate rises. Broker was telling me to ride it out with a tracker and the inflation/interest rises will be short lived.

Nah, got a 10 year fixed rate at a rate that is around half the current BOE base. He just couldn't understand that we're fine with 10 years at a rate that might be even double the rate banks offer in say 2-3 years. Because we can afford it fine. The risk is low with the fixed rate, whereas the risk of a tracker/standard mortgage almost has to upper limit.

Also, if the rate actually came down to half our fixed rate it would potentially be worth the penalty to exit early. It's still kinda win/win in the UK, but timing can screw you over.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It just feels like a huge gamble. I went the tracker route between 2012 and 2018 only because I didn't want the overpayment restrictions imposed by fixed deals.

Luckily it worked out, had I gone for a fixed rate I'd still be slowly paying it off, at a higher rate.

For every person who did well, there's someone else who didn't, mostly through unlucky timing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How much did you want to overpay? Pretty sure we're allowed to do something like 10% of remaining balance per year. Which, so far at least has been fine.

And yes, this is generally how the banks work the risks I suspect. They will lose out on some deals, but gain hugely from others. For us, after 10 years of fixed payments there won't be much left (even less if kitchen appliances stop failing and giving us ways to not put money onto the mortgage)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I wanted to pay it down while the rates were low, 10% would've started off ok, but obviously the lower it got, the less that was. Makes sense from the bank's pov, seems a fair trade-off for a fix.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

aside from maybe a bit more each year due to any potential tax increase!

Also insurance increases.

Incidentally, my taxes and insurance are more than half of my total mortgage payment, and are responsible for it increasing something like 30% over a decade.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Part of your house is paid off in that time. All mortgages are structured so that in 30 years they are paid in full. So if in 10 or 15 years you need to refinance somehow it will be cheaper than financing 100% of a residence.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That doesn't mean shit if your rate goes from 3% to 8 % and your payment doubles.

Dit he math. Even if u buy a 300000 house and pay off a full third in 3 years which is absurd.

What's 200k at 3% vs 200k at 8%?

Go ahead, I'll wait.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Not sure why the aggression...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Imagine being 10 or 20 years into your mortgage and suddenly you can't afford your payments anymore due to a rate increase. You have to sell the house and then try to find another one at the inflated rate and then start back from square one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

You'd have to be wildly irresponsible to have that happen. Theoretically you've paid off well over half of your house after 15 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You can also get 15 year loans with fixed rates here in the states. They’re usually .1% better on the interest rate compared to a 30 year, so for most people it doesn’t make sense to go with a 15 year when you can pay substantially less on a 30. Plus homes here are very much a very safe investment. When you own the home you only pay property tax generally after you pay the mortgage and in states like California that can mean an incredibly cheap place to live once paid (I’m talking 100s of dollars a year, though that will go up over time).

People bitch about housing here in the states, and it’s definitely not as good as it once was, but it’s also not as bad as many other places. I travel to Canada regularly and their shit is fucked. 😅

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When you own the home you only pay property tax generally after you pay the mortgage and in states like California that can mean an incredibly cheap place to live once paid (I’m talking 100s of dollars a year, though that will go up over time).

This is actually a significant cause of California's housing crisis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Are you saying that people living in the homes that they own are causing the housing crisis? Or what?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kind of yeah. Prop 13 definitely is part of the issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Well that's ridiculous. What do you expect people do to, just give up the house they live in for someone else who needs a house? This isn't Palestine, it's the USA and we are well within our rights to keep living in the homes we paid for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, absolutely, in California. Generally, everywhere too but that's a much broader topic.

In California specifically, property tax costs are based on the grandfathered price of the house, which means that there are people who inherited homes bought for $30k 80 years ago and still pay that amount of property tax.

This traps both the taxable value of the house and the land itself and keeps it from being developed, when normally someone might be priced out by the taxes a $10 million home would generally cost.

In the State of California, real property is reassessed at market value if it is sold or transferred and property taxes can sometimes increase dramatically as a result. However, if the sale or transfer is between parents and their children, under limited circumstances, the property will not be reassessed if certain conditions are met and the proper application is timely filed.

https://www.sfassessor.org/tax-savings/exclusions/reappraisal-exclusion-grandparent-grandchild

It's just one of many reasons (which is why housing costs are insane everywhere), but it is a significant contributor in California.

Generally, the law being written to benefit homeowners is the single greatest cause of our housing crisis, and this is one element of how those laws are crafted toward existing homeowners.

Consider: if homes are "nest eggs" that always go up in value, what is happening to the price of homes, all the time?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Canadian here. It's 5 years for us!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most people can't afford the real cost of a home and instead end up paying something like 2.5 times the value in interest over those 30 years. Those who can will always go for a 15 year loan and try to pay it off somewhere in the 10 - 12 year range, the rest just pay interest for decades.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

In Canada the typical amortization is 25, but you renew at market rates every 3-5 years.

Some people are gonna be fucked raw next renewal period after this rate run but the government instituted a stress test rate you would have to meet to qualify for mortgage which should help keep things stable. Should.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

You can choose to have a lower term mortgage if you want to.