this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
English usage and grammar
363 readers
2 users here now
A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.
If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]).
Online resources:
- Cambridge English Dictionary
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary and Thesaurus
- Gilman's Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. This is a great and witty reference about usage, its history, and its controveries
Sibling communities:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: entry "English" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer's "The Wife of Bath's Tale".)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hmmm. It's a wonder that hooves isn't a slightly archaic word now too. And that gooves never was in use instead of goofs, which could apply to booves, pooves, and wooves.
But, yeah broham, rooves is a valid, if archaic word in the king's english. I'm kinda surprised that a Canadian wouldn't have awareness of the differences in the three main branches of English having slightly different usages and spellings.
I mean, you have seen color and colour used before, right? Both are correct spellings. There's stuff like learnt vs learned.
Even that's ignoring major things where entirely different words are used like with boot vs trunk.