this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
199 points (98.1% liked)

Selfhosted

39435 readers
6 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
199
If I self host a Lemmy instance for just myself and maybe a few friends are there any risks? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Looking to maybe self host my own instance, I'm still learning about the fediverse. If a different instance that I federate with hosts something illegal are there risks to me? Is anything from other instances hosted on my server like a copy of it? Or would I only end up hosting things my users post? I'm paranoid and sorry if this is a silly question.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're in the US, The Communications Decency Act Section 230 has a couple powers.

  1. It removes liability to service providers for user generated content when active moderation is practiced, and

  2. It removes liability to service providers for any moderation actions taken to to moderate to reasonable community standards.

Prior to CDA230, the jurisprudence centered around 2 different cases. In one, an actively moderated system had illegal content and didn't remove it in time, and in another case, a non-actively moderated system had illegal content and didn't remove it in time. At that time, the actively moderated system was held to be liable for the illegal content, whereas the non-actively moderated system was held not to be liable for not removing the illegal content.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One caveat to that would be the DMCA, where liability protection as a service provider I think is contingent on there being a DMCA process available so infringing content can be removed.

I don't know enough about how that all works with the fediverse, however.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The fediverse is still a relatively small thing, even with all the popularity it’s been getting.

So dmcas are yet to happen