this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
243 points (84.2% liked)
linuxmemes
20880 readers
10 users here now
I use Arch btw
Sister communities:
- LemmyMemes: Memes
- LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
- RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts
Community rules
- Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
- Be civil
- Post Linux-related content
- No recent reposts
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Excuse me, but that type of foolishness requires
-- no-preserve-root
nowadaysNot in this case. It's
*/
here so it expands to directories at current location. I'm sure that's a typo thoughI'm not brave enough to test it on my distro, so I'll take your word on that lol
You can do
echo */
andecho /*
to see how they expand. Alsorm -rf /
already is enough without the*
as it already is recursive*
is there to bypass the need for--no-preserve-root
rm -rf /
needs--no-preserve-root
on GNU coreutils, I think.why do they even have that lever
Originally,
rm
would merrily nuke your whole filesystem if you told it to. At some point, someone thought that was a pretty stupid default behaviour, so they added that flag to change the default to not nuke your entire filesystem. However, they made the change backwards compatible in case someone still needed the old behaviour. I can imagine in a container or throwaway environment, it might be vaguely reasonable to expect to be able the blat/
.See also:
yes
I'm aware of how recursive force remove works. I'm just kidding around.
Anybody brave enough to tell the MS rep this on patch night??
(You have backups, right?)