this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
8 points (90.0% liked)

C & C++

891 readers
2 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When C++11 came out, there was an immediate feeling that the language had received a major overhaul and the best ways to do most things had completely changed. Everything from before that was legacy code, though a lot of it was around. I expect it is still mostly like that.

Or do you mean about Rust? Yes that is new. I still don't understand the attraction of Rust over Ada that well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, I mean in 2014 the advice was not to start with the latest. Every source I found on the topic recommended getting familiar with 8 and then increment my way up to 14.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think the C++11 edition (whichever it was) of Stroustrup's book TC++PL suggested using C++11 immediately. That is what I would have suggested. I used C++ by necessity in a few projects before that, but I didn't start actually somewhat liking it until C++11. Everything before that was ugly legacy code.