this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2023
151 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37551 readers
493 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm honestly sort of suspicious of this report. I wouldn't be surprised if the information is misrepresented or outright fabricated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not really that surprised. I think a lot of people use netflix and just didn't get a sub, because why pay for something that is free. I think a lot of people used the same account then grew up, moved out, moved on and just kept using the same account. Now that they cannot, they are happy to pay for it. My wife and I have not been kicked off my parents account yet. I do not know how long it takes to kick in. But, once we do, we may subscribe again, but it is not a rush as we are watching a lot of disney plus at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Of course, I did figure that at least some folks would get their own, but the growth is much higher than I was expecting. It's also a death knell of sorts that will start a feeding frenzy for other streaming services I think though. In a few years, it may not be an option for ANY service to share passwords.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, someone on Tumblr has pointed out that the data does not actually support the headline here. The spike actually started just before the crackdown and immediately dropped.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It coulr be misleading, but outright lying here wouldn't be particularly useful since they have a duty to report truthfully on their finicial results.

E: nvm I just realized the source isn't Netflix themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it isn't from netflix themselves. And, even if it was, the consequences for lying are rarely ever greater than the benefit. If the stocks go up AT ALL because of them, someone's benefitting.