this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1146 points (84.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
2 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Time to update the meme.

  1. windows: oh no, I was in a meeting!
  2. mac: oh no, I need a new mac for this to work!
  3. Linux: I'm afraid to install this, my graphics will probably break again!
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven't had to touch xorg.conf in many years

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's been so long since X broke that most people won't know what you mean by xorg.conf

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Hey, now with Wayland we get whole new things to fix when they break.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

what the hell that exists?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’ve had some programs break because their dependencies updated before them but never the graphics

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Nvidia thing probably

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can pause and schedule update on Windows

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you can't decline them or postpone indefinitely. It'll eventually force you to restart and update, and that's a problem.

When updates break a piece of critical software and can't be postponed indefinitely it's a real problem.

I've also run into instances where my PC was performing a task that required several weeks of processing time and Windows forced a restart because the process time was longer than the postponement window, so a task that's supposed to take 3 weeks suddenly takes 6 weeks.

Yes, security is important, but sometimes it's secondary to the entire fucking reason a computer has been deployed, and Microsoft shouldn't be dictating my priorities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You can decline them semi permanently. Mine will ask again in the year 2077.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I forget the specifics, because I've had autoupdates turned off for a while now, but I think it would make you set "active hours" and then would do updates outside of your active hours. Regardless of you actually using your computer at the time. And, back in the day, my sleep schedule was non-existent, so there was no time that was completely safe for doing updates.

There was a time when you could postpone, but they got rid of that, or limited it... eventually you'd end up with an unstoppable update. It seems microsoft is trying tons of things to get people to stay up to date, but none are satisfying to everyone.

I prefer my method, which isn't easily accessible to all, manually updating periodically. Sometimes I'm a month or 2 late, but the worst of the worst vulnerabilities ends up news and that'll get me to update sooner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I do not think that any solution will satisfy everyone. the limit of 35 days is probably a bit short.