this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
412 points (97.9% liked)

Ukraine

8203 readers
445 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anti-material rifles were initially designed to take out tanks. However all modern tanks have thick enough armor to deflect its bullets.

Now APC's, trucks, vans, and most engines and electronics are destroyed by these rounds. Hence the anti-material label now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Given some of the antique tanks the Russians pulled out of the moth ball heap, it might still be an anti-tank-weapon occasionally ...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Would it be possible to ruin the barrel by shooting at it from the side? Or would it just ricochet?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The barrel is thicker than the armor on tanks. Usually they weigh in at over 2 tons of steel. The circular shape also makes it very likely to deflect the impact like sloped armor.

It might make a little ding in the paint.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They are designed to withstand huge pressures while maintaining their structure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

She must be very strong if she can hold up 4 tons of steel.