General Discussion

6 readers

2 users here now

Want something to discuss? Post it here

Follow instance rules, be decent human being...

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do we have a problem with squatters? (lemmy.fmhy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are a lot of communities that were created in the last week but never had any kind of interaction or their mods never started to post to attract people (they don't even have rules or a description).
Will there be some kind of cleanup or will it stay there until someone asks to take over it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Community squatting can be favorable in some cases. Consider the bias of (for example) letting a representive of PepsiCo control a mag “m/Pepsi”. That moderator would censor anything critical of Pepsi. The narrative would be one-sided & pro-Pepsi. I would rather see m/Pepsi go to some random squatter than people from an official org.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't wanna say this is how somebody ends up buying knock-off Pepsi from a forum, but this might be the only way that could happen 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well but the reality is that /more/ people will buy knock-off Pepsi if PepsiCo allows critical posts to be seen. When they censor for brand-protection, no one knows except the person they censored. Sure the quietly censored people (who likely already boycott Pepsi) will boycott but everyone else unwittingly enjoys their Pepsi-loving forum.

Unlike #Reddit there is a mod log. That helps a little but probably not many users look at that.