this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
329 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
524 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Killing when we don't have to is cruel, doing it in the forest doesn't make it better, we can just eat plants.

There's nothing fair about needless killing, nothing is provided to you, you're taking it be force.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We are animals engineered to eat meat. It is natural for humans to do so. Killing an animal has nothing to do with morality. How it's done does

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Humans aren't engineered at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We are animals who happened to mutate to be able to thrive with and without meat, we're omnivores.

If we are animals and killing animals has nothing to do with morality I can kill you with no consequences and without feeling bad yeah?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like I said, why you do it and how it's done matters. What's your reason for killing me? For this discussion of course.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Let's say I thought your corpse would taste good and provide me with sustenance for a while and I killed you painfree and instantly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then that's not a good reason. "Because it's good" doesn't justify the kill. For survival? Sure, I'd give that a pass, even though I'd defend myself. I would understand the situation. And people have done this.

If you have this "no-kill" stance for animals, you need to have it for everything, including insects. I'm not saying you don't, because I don't really know, but I do know that's often overlooked or ignored.

A life is a life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's literally the same argument you're using.

You don't need to eat animals for survival.

I don't kill insects on purpose.

Yes a life is a life and shouldn't be wasted because you think corpses taste good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@NotAPenguin @trashhalo @marx2k @reric88
On earth, death is as natural as eating other life forms. It’s how Mother Earth survives, not unlike how our bodies recycle dead cells and attack foreign ones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you'd be fine with me eating you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A life is a life.

Plants too are living beings. Cutting them, letting them starve without their roots, dissecting it in various parts to be sold...

Why don't we think about it? Are we so extremely sure plants don't feel any type of pain, not even a much different pain that animals can't understand?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have to survive on something, and at the very least we choose the least-sentient thing we can find to eat. Plants do have a nervous system, but they don't have a brain. Or a centralized brain, anyway.

We don't know if plants can feel pain, but we definitely know that plants respond to damage

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Completely true. But it also shows how the need for anyone and anything to survive always comes from hurting something.

Nature is, de facto, unfair. A prey will struggle against a predator, much like when something else is a "predator" to something that most of the times cannot more or respond.

There is simply no way of not causing harm ever in all processes of producing food, especially without heavily reducing the quality of life of many humans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hell yes, we moved on to canabalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You are trolling at this point. You simply can't compare killing for food to murder.

We are predators by nature, and there is no way you can deny it. The human intelligence has helped us evolve better tools for both hunting and farming.

We have mutated to be better hunters and predators, apart from being also better at not being one. But the first part will always remain.