this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
492 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
12 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google executives acknowledged this month they need to do a better job surfacing user-generated content after the recent Reddit blackouts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I've stopped using it. I now bounce around alternatives but Kagi is the best and my go to now. Here are some alternatives to consider:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Thank you for bringing up Kagi, I had never heard of it before. An intriguing idea for sure and I am not averse to paying for searches, but as a serial Google-fu practitioner $10/month for 1000 searches (1.5c per search after) seems quite steep to me. Some days I swear that would last me 24 hours at most. I need to start tracking that I think.

I do however applaud the seeming transparency on their website. It may or may not be for me, but if they really plan to operate how they lay out on their website, it truly is a breath of fresh air and I wish them luck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Thank you for bringing up Kagi

Comparing the pricing on a "search value" basis is compelling, but I'll be damned if I can't find concrete details on what they actually do differently. Just looks like a lot of marketing-speak.

E.g., do they have humans reviewing the results? Or is it just LLM crap? Because if it's more AI bullshit, they can fuck right off to where the Titanic and Titan lay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just seeing this for the first time also, but one of the features they list is it looks like you can "block or boost" domains in your search results. I miss when Google let you block domains for results, so this would be a killer feature for me. I don't mind paying, but just the pricing seems a bit odd. I could see myself paying $5 per month for unlimited searches, not sure if 300 or 1000 is enough, $25 per month for unlimited is crazy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I miss when Google let you block domains for results

Does boolean not do that for you? E.g., "-domain.com?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

After using a search engine with this functionality, I quickly realised how many domains I never wanted to see again, and how many I valued. Google has been promoting garbage domains for so many years now because they pay better than the quality sites. The algorithm goes both ways, as in, "show me more," and, "show me less." To make the bad ones disappear, you'd need a notepad next to your Google window with a list of dozens of domains you don't like to append to every query you make. Unfortunately Google doesn't offer you the ability to positively bias domains because they'd earn less. So you'll still see the first few pages of garbage, depending on your search.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)