Science

13013 readers

56 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

125

Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting (retractionwatch.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe ChatGPT just hates you personally, then.

You're saying "it can't work for anyone because it doesn't work for me!" And I'm saying "well, it worked for me, so maybe you're using it wrong."

You can't insist it's not working for me because it did. I'm not disputing that it didn't work for you, all I can suggest is reading up a bit on prompt engineering to see if you can find out what you're doing differently.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@FaceDeer @floofloof @henfredemars @PoisonedPrisonPanda @sab @Vilian I’m not saying it didn’t work for you. I’m saying it’s only good for entry level stuff… It’s not coming for my job yet, but I can seriously see it stealing work from the overseas, underpaid, code shops in China/India.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I am not an "entry level" coder.

I also am not concerned with it "coming for my job." It's a collaborator with humans, not a replacement for them.