this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
22 points (92.3% liked)
anime
10812 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to c/anime on Hexbear!
A leftist general anime community for discussion and memes.
Simple rules
-
Be nice.
-
Use spoiler tags.
-
Don't sexualise underage characters, including 1000 year old loli ones.
-
Don't post hentai here. This is an anime community.
High quality threads you should definitely visit
Gigathread: Good Anime Talks, Presentations, Conventions, Panels, etc
Piracy is good and you should do more of it. Use https://9anime.to/ and https://4anime.to/ for streaming, and https://nyaa.si/ for torrents. Piracy is the only means of digital protest that audiences have to fight poor worker treatment.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's more about vampires being rich assholes than the other way around, but it's a great start.
But it's cool because at least it seems they're deliberate with most of their politics and using the historical period to inform the plot. But they didn't have a Belmont fuck up slavers or rich dudes yet. I'm just hoping that happens in season 2.
I can hope.
I really liked how the previous show had a working romantic relationship between two competent adult characters where it starts there and there's no senpai notice me nyaaaah waifu shit at all.
It's interesting to me since they're "retconning" Annette from being Richter's girlfriend from the start. On the plus side, it looks like they made her an actual character as opposed to the games.
Yeah, me too. I'd be ecstatic to see the guy from my favorite game in the series slaughter the more human kind of bloodsucking monster.
If it means anything, the precedent for the Belmonts to intervene in mundane human politics was set in the first series since the moment Trevor saved the Seekers from a pogrom (which was heavily coded in themes of historical antisemitism/antiziganism.
That's a good point. The only question is will they (the writers, showrunners, or executives) pass the low bar of having a Belmont being antislavery?
It's one thing to have side characters being political. It's another to make the main character take a stand on a crime against humanity.
It's less a critique of just this show, but I hate the tendency of making side characters take clear stands on issues while the main protagonists never say where they stand on the subject.
It's a cowardly concession that feels like the pandering of a quick same sex kiss. It's there enough to say they did it, but not enough to impact how someone looks at the main character. The main character is ambiguous enough that their status of hero is the only indicator they're a good person. They save the world, but you can decide for yourself what their opinions are on minorities or whatever.
That way, people on the left who want to like the show can have something and chuds can say "_____ was great, but they had to add in the sjw character to say something woke."
I hope Castlevania subverts the trend so the chuds have to reckon with their hero having different better views than them.