this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
236 points (98.0% liked)

Gaming

19925 readers
42 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This means you can't pass the game around to your friends or sell it afterwards, which completely ruins the purpose of physical media imo. I mostly play PC these days so this doesn't affect me, but it's a disappointing direction for console games. At least they could've used an empty disc that has proof of ownership.

EDIT: Bethesda has confirmed that only the PC version won't include a disc. Physical versions of Xbox will include a disc. Whew.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why? Not trying to argue, just genuinely curious.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they’re calling it a physical copy it should be a physical copy of the game data. Having a case to hold a code is a ridiculous slap in the face. And a waste of plastic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Unless (and I'm not saying it's the case here) they make sure took indicate it's only the code and include swag like physical maps, a game booklet, or limited edition collectables with it. Then I could see it.

Otherwise it's just misleading advertising

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can resell a disk, not a code that is one time use.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or maybe it should be possible to resell a code.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably need some way to track who owns the code in a robust way. I will not say what technology might come to mind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The word you're looking for is "database"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would you need that? You don't have that with physical copies either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The physical copy already has a tangible form which probably has copy protection built in. If a code would be transferred instead of copied, it would be necessary to know who owns it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You would have to deactivate the game in the store before you got the code out. That deactivation would also delete the game files to clean up everything.
Maybe you made a copy somewhere else, but you'd now have to crack the DRM on most games.
Only if the game doesn't have DRM it relies on you honoring the agreement.
A similar situation would be processing refunds, where GOG allows refunds up to 30 days after purchase, even if you downloaded and launched the game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's the way it would need to work for Steam as an example, yes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

We shouldn’t have to rent everything. If you want free market economics (which corporations claim) then don’t hold the market captive. You cannot have it both ways.