this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
476 points (96.7% liked)
Programmer Humor
32464 readers
518 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In python, 'eval()' is your friend.
/maliciouscompliance
locals()[“x”] = 1
Oh god I hate you so much for this. It's beautiful that it's possible but I also want you to know you're instigating cybercrimes.
Nah, the locals() or globals() object is much better for this.
In c, nothing and nobody is your friend.
Source: me
++ is your friend
# is your worst enemy despite being a copy of a good language
Objectively...
In Perl,
eval
can do similar things, but symbolic references are "better" (I'm fairly sure it's where PHP got the idea, and the syntax, from.) e.g.Reading other responses, it seems like Python's
globals
object is not entirely dissimilar, especially if you know how Perl deals with symbolic references under the hood.But just because you can doesn't mean you should. If you
use strict;
in Perl, it will fail to compile most of this nonsense. Use a hash / associative array / dictionary / whatever your language (natural and/or programming) calls them instead.And I'm pretty sure that even without
strict
, local variables can't be accessed at all the symbolic way, which is probably for the best. (NB:local
is a subtle thing in Perl. By "local" here, I mean the so-calledmy
variables that aren't accessible outside their scope.local
variables are actually localised globals. Enjoy that thought.)