this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
205 points (97.7% liked)
Europe
8324 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐ฉ๐ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And in Austria, some people just blew up part of a glacier to make room for a ski tournament. (sorry, no english source)
I don't think that the glacier as an intact sheet of ice has value so much as it just is a particularly-visible sign of global warming, because small temperature changes to large masses of ice that are bounded by the melting temperature of water produce large changes to that mass.
They are THE most important source of water during the summer. Their importance cannot be overstated. Switzerland gets 60% of its electricity from hydro power, which from spring to late autumn is glacier melt water. They replenish in winter with snowfall then slowly let the snow melt in summer. Without them we get flooding in spring and drought in autunn. The Rhine and the Po rivers, crucially important to Germany and Italy, are fed by glaciers. Italy's most productive agricultural areas are watered by the Po river. Switzerland will experience water shortages when the glaciers are gone, something the Swiss cannot fathom, because until now we always had so much water we could waste it and still have more left than we could ever use. And if Switzerland has too little water you can imagine what will happen to Italy and France.
afaik they are important for the water supply of rivers in spring
I expect that the ice will still be melting wherever they put it. And according to the article, what they put in its place is snow on crushed rock, so that'll probably be melting too.
The problem is that this melts in a few weeks in spring.
So we get flooding in spring and drought in autumn - instead of a nice steady flow from early spring to late autumn. The glaciers are irreplaceable.