this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

104 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the free open-source AIs are fine? I've seen plenty of objections to those as well.

[–] Still 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think there is a wording issue going on here, people object to their posts being used in ways they weren't expecting, in this case people post things for others to see not for use in AI datasets,

whether the AI is open source or not doesn't effect anything about the training data being used with or without permission

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If explicit permission for specifically AI training is required then AI is basically impossible, because nobody gave that permission.

I don't think such permission should be required, though, either legally or ethically. When you put something up for public viewing you don't get to retroactively go "but not like that" when something you didn't expect looks at it. The permission you gave inherently involves flexibility.