this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
241 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
292 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes but why is that better. For censorship you mean?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's better because Bing may still have selling ads as a priority when building the indexer. If you're not the one paying, you're the product.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You do know it's not an either- or situation, right? You can be both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a good point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It changes the question from "why not use duck" to "what does duck really add to bing"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

@eltimablo @throws_lemy @xilliah @rastilin what it removes from bing: tracking, and personalized results. I believe it also adds the bang search, which few if any other places have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well they have a sensible business model and can provide another stream of income for Bing from users it otherwise wouldn't reach.