this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)
Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy
3 readers
1 users here now
We follow Lemmy’s code of conduct.
Communities
- News and Events
- Ethics, Law, Philsophy
- ML Research
- NLP/Prompting
- Projects #buildinpublic
- Jailbreaks and Security
- OffTopic
Useful links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is that you're opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?
It's fact.
In your opinion.
In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
That's why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.
It's not my opinion, it's fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I've built a few of them. It isn't intelligence. That's not refutable.
Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you've built both, you should know that.