this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
338 points (94.5% liked)

Linux Memes

1048 readers
1 users here now

A little experimental Linux memes community. We'll see how this works out!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not really true. Plenty of Linux distributions dropped 32bit support years ago and 32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years (last ones were some Intel Atoms released around 2010).

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When talking about Linux desktops it includes distros like Debian, who will support i386 until, at least 2028. Even some fast moving distros like OpenSuse Tumbleweed still support i386.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm running crunchbang++ on my i686 box.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can I play command and conquer on all i386 Linux install? Otherwise I'm sticking with DOS.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have Linux running strongly on two laptops from 2007. If I still had my old Dell from 2003, I'd bet I could get the latest Puppy Linux running on it. Maybe even something like Debian or Arch32, if I maxed out the RAM.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I’m inclined to do this with my old iMac and MacBook from 12 years ago, but I can’t think of anything to do with them after. Donate them maybe?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've tried Arch32 a while ago, the project isn't that well maintained (like I appreciate they're trying), I've had MX Linux before, worked great, just a bit outdated, I moved my 32bit machine to Void Linux, it seems to have the best support yet ! I'm running cutting edge kernel and dev tools on that old fart

[–] thejodie 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years"

I don't follow. The i386 is almost 40 years old now. Can you elaborate?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it may have began 4 decades ago, but what matters is that only one decade ago new hardware was still being released.

[–] thejodie 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And new processors stopped supporting x86-32 a decade ago?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

nope, new processors still do. At least on intel/amd processors. it's only software that decided to drop support

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ya, 64 bit was becoming more common/standard 16ish years ago with vista right? I remember I had to get vista even though I didn't want to because it had support for 64 but.