The original thread is on the devil’s website and I don’t want to direct traffic to it, so here’s a link to the tweet instead:
https://twitter.com/davidfowl/status/1671351948640129024?s=46&t=OEG0fcSTxko2ppiL47BW1Q
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
28 points (93.8% liked)
.NET
1484 readers
7 users here now
Getting started
Useful resources
IDEs and code editors
- Visual Studio (Windows/Mac)
- Rider (Windows/Mac/Linux)
- Visual Studio Code (Windows/Mac/Linux)
Tools
Rules
- Rule 1: Follow Lemmy rules
- Rule 2: Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
- Rule 3: No spam of tools/companies/advertisements
Related communities
Wikipedia pages
- .NET (open source & cross platform)
- .NET Framework (proprietary & Windows-only)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You speak much truth, but I think ther is more open source than even Microsoft sees in the ecosystem. Getting started producing working projects feels easier in .net to me.
I was a Java developer in the early days, and found the platform very frustrating. Things started to improve with the spring framework. And when I heard about spring boot, I was very pleased to see that it was all about making a standardized easy initial project startup configuration.
I recently had to do some Java for the first time and literally decades. I was able to use Java 17.
I felt it was vastly better than the early days, I was frustrated by things like the incomplete implementation of generics. And it appears that was a direct result of the way Java evolved.
Unfortunately, it appears many if not most Java projects are still stuck in Java 8 because of all of the Legacy installed code and a lack of decisiveness toward upgrading.
As for .net, I'm a little worried about some of the things coming out of Microsoft lately. I fear they may be returning to some of their old ways. Time will tell.