this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
2007 points (95.7% liked)

Memes

45739 readers
867 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lightning's data transfer and charging are subpar, although I'm not sure if Apple is implementing PD fast charging on the new iPhone either.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They are not, unless you get the pro as far as I have seen/heard. The regular iPhone is artificially limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It is not artificially limited. It’s using the board from last year’s Pro model. It doesn’t have a USB3 interface.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Pro still doesn't have PD charging.

When they go portless (I'm guessing next year or 2) they don't want people bitching that the charging is slower, so they're not going to support wired charging that's faster than wireless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The same law that forces standardised cable by the EU also forces Apple to not go portless, since it needs a standardised port on the device that can be used to charge.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

USB 2.0 vs. 3.0 data has nothing to do with USB PD charging wattage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is to force users to use cloud solutions and lock users in the apple ecosystem

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

I do not think the charging wattage is limited in the way data transfer speeds are on the non Pro Max models. Only Pro Max is getting USB3 data speeds. Atleast I have not heard Apple gimping wired charging speeds on any of the new iPhones.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I didnt say it was great, I said it was good enough for a very long time. And in all honesty i think its data transfer speeds were always subpar.

My personal pet theory is that it was designed the way it was in order to make a cost-cutting measure look fancy and luxurious.