this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
2006 points (95.7% liked)

Memes

45641 readers
1248 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It was a good cable when it came out, but as soon as USB-C became common it was obsolete. It was limited to USB2 speeds and did not support fast charging.

Which, seeing how Apple is still hellbent on continuing to only have USB2 speeds even with USB-C, plus lockout chips, their new connector is obsolete as well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still don't understand the reason for the speed limit tbh. It just makes their product look like shit.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Faster USB chipset is more expensive and potentially also physically larger with more traces on the circuit board to deal with I imagine. And faster data speeds require more attention to how the traces are routed to prevent interference. I very much doubt this is anything other than to save a relatively small amount on materials and engineering costs, on an already overpriced phone, and/or to try and "encourage" you to use iCloud by making offline sync and backup painfully slow.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone involved in engineering boards with both USB 2.0 and 3.0 the costs are negligible. You're not wrong about more traces or about it requiring more attention but per phone this cost less then a few cents.

I think it's more about the upsell to the Pro line or as you suggested encouraging use of iCloud.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As I remember it the USB 3.0 chips can cause interference in 2.4GHz range unless shielding is used and the USB chipset is kept far away from the 2.4Ghz antennas. Probably just “juice not worth the squeeze” on the smaller non-pro model, if there’s a significant chance it could interfere with Bluetooth and wifi.