this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

104 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

The U.S. Copyright Office has again rejected copyright protection for art created using artificial intelligence, denying a request by artist Jason M. Allen for a copyright covering an award-winning image he created with the generative AI system Midjourney.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Copyright is incompatible with AI, and they know it. If an image gets generated, who can be seen as the owner?

  • The person who wrote the prompt?

  • The AI who used its knowledge to generate the image?

  • The researcher who developed the AI?

  • The multiple artists on which the work is based?

Those Copyright Offices are on the precipice of being deemed useless. This is one of their final struggles to stay relevant.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Or the novelty of AI-created art will wear off and we'll go on with our lives.