this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
107 points (96.5% liked)

Canada

7209 readers
208 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

These dumbasses are handed such an easy path to getting a majority and they're going to squander it on these stupid conservative culture war takes. I really hope Canadians see soon that if they feel let down by the liberals, the conservatives are only going to be a shittier version of the worst aspects of the liberals. We should be looking to the NDP or green parties for real change.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Liberals should really campaign by just showing Ontario since Doug ford was elected and saying "see what happens"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The Liberals could include Manitoba in that campaign as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of the parties really seem like they are ready to even talk about the real issues facing Canada, let alone actually do anything about them. No party seems to have any real plans to address housing affordability/shortages, wage stagnation, high insurance/telecommunication service prices and the various monopolies fuelling these issues. I think the lack of plans for these major issues is a signifcant factor why younger generations are not voting. They don't really feel like any party is ready to help with their biggest problems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Look, I hate the conservatives as much as the next guy but this isn't true. They have specific policy planks about the housing shortage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvFFGoAVeDY

(Warning, PP's YouTube channel, I don't know if you want that in your watch history considering how yt might use it for recommendations).

I've said before -- most of their policy is terrifying and evil. But on the housing shortage, Poilievre's echoing progressive YIMBYs like AOC. The party has clear and good policy ideas there and the Liberals should steal them to take this weapon away from them, the same way they steal policy ideas from the NDP.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is he just removing some red tape on SFH, municipal taxes on devlopments and allowing places like the greenbelt to be developed or does he want to change the urban fabric of our cities by removing zoning laws that make builiding multi units and density impossible and force developers to build affordable housing as well as luxury homes? These both can increase the supply of housing but in very different ways that will impact urban fabric and housing prices. The conversation isn't as simple as build more houses anywhere they can fit. Many of our cities have spralwed themselves into near bankruptcy and adding a new subdivsion and stripmall outside of town will not fix that. We need more variety in the housing market but as it stands it seems everyone is expected to own a minimum lot size with 2 car garage and 3 stories to their house regardless of their actual needs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a firm green infill YIMBY so I agree with you on the policy stuff there. As for PP, fortunately the greenbelt is provincial so he doesn't have the right to do so. This is constitutional. And he's calling out Vancouver, a place where there is no place to sprawl, so necessarily cutting out red tape and unlocking housing would mean upzoning, they'd have literally no other option to allow more housing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he wanted to push for that why hasn't he used supporting language like density and transit? I hope for the best for these cities but I worry the conservative take will just mean more McMansions while SFH continue to be converted into multi units owned by landlords.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I mean he is? He specifically calls out density limits around transit hubs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=WvFFGoAVeDY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.