this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1212 points (86.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9691 readers
1012 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ok?

So for example the "lived experience" of black folks in the southern US in the 60s isn't valuable I'm the discussion of racism in America? Of course it is. Their first hand experience (indeed anecdotal as you say) is meaningful.

In the context of apartments, especially in America, millions of units are no where near the soundproofing or quality OP was describing. You could determine that by age of the buildings alone.

Do you have sound dampening data for apartments across the country?

Anecdotes are only problematic when they are purported as data. By definition someone relaying their lives experience suggests they are describing their individual life to you. It's fine to want to move from anecdote to data, but when you talk about "disqualification" from discussion you're just being a gatekeeper. There is no data rigor here, this is a message board about a meme.

Lastly the person I responded to described THEIR lived experience (the quiet apartment they have) so that further insulates myself and others from any objective requirements to comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So for example the “lived experience” of black folks in the southern US in the 60s isn’t valuable I’m the discussion of racism in America?

When their "lived experience" is "no, I've never seen any racism!" then no, it's not really valuable, and it's incredibly suspect to boot.

It’s fine to want to move from anecdote to data

Let's just start with data. Anecdotes are supplementary. The way "lived experience" is usually used (and is used here) is to provide the primary support to an argument.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again you're expecting a rigor beyond the venue of discussion, especially given that the person I replied to started with an anecdote as well.

If you have data on the soundproofedness of apartments across the US to contextualize the common consensus to the level you expect I would be happy to browse it.

Until then I'm comfortable believing anyone (as in the many commenters here) who say their apartment was loud. The several I lived in were as well so I have no reason to question it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you’re expecting a rigor beyond the venue of discussion

Maybe, but I'm trying to change that. I think we can all be smarter than just trading anecdotes.

And your post emphasizes my point. We're talking about a preferred hypothetical society, while the point he was trying to make with his anecdote is that apartments are and always will be poorly soundproofed, world without end. Obviously it sounds absurd when you extrapolate it out to the societal level, but when you couch it in anecdotal terms it makes the argument seem worth discussing on the face of it. It's not.

We can talk about how currently apartments are shoddy in the US, that's a worthwhile discussion. But to be against the idea of apartments in general because apartments right now are poorly regulated is silly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fine, go tell it to OP, he's making top level anecdotal comments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I just see a lot of data in his posts actually

https://lemmy.world/u/Fried_out_Kombi

With sources too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Indeed but I'm not replying to that here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed but I'm not replying to that here