this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
48 points (96.2% liked)

Formula 1

9013 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇺🇸 United States 18-20 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico 25-27 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil 01-03 Nov
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not wanting to take too much away from max and red bull but I do wonder how well other teams would be doing it they had also ignored the cost cap.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Holy shit get over the catering PLEASE

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Strange way of saying "I wonder how well other teams would be doing if they had also nailed the new regulations to perfection"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mate, let it go. Ultimately is was 400k I believe?

The decreased wind tunnel-time and CFD-time do have an impact, so I can't imagine any advantage from that 400k to still be lasting.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 400k is a lie. It was over a million. The 400k figure was if they had applied for a tax break they didn't apply for and had been granted it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you are correcting figures one way, you have to correct them both ways. That is how financial auditors always work.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm really sorry, please forgive my ignorance, but I don't know what you mean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am a financial accountant in a fairly large company. When external auditors look at the figures, they add up everything that they find. It doesn't matter if the error is increasing or decreasing the profit-figure, they calculate the total of the errors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, okay, that makes sense I guess. Seems weird from a lay point of view, but if that's the industry standard.

Thanks for explaining.