969
[REPOST] Woman says she started wearing ‘terrible wigs’ after work banned her pink hair
(www.thelondoneconomic.com)
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
969 points (97.5% liked)
Malicious Compliance
18113 readers
1 users here now
People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.
======
-
We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
-
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
-
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.
======
Also check out the following communities:
[email protected] [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This deserved 172 downvotes appearently... Lol :)
It's a very very sensitive Lemmy user group....
Go back to reddit.
🤦
If you went over to the /funny sub and complained about the person in the post being funny what kind of a response would you expect?
Honestly I wouldn't even downvote.
I think having an opinion is something I appreciate, even when it's not a popular one or one I agree with.
Lots of little keyboard warriors gets upset when someone has an opinion they don't agree with, but to me, that's perfectly normal.
I asked what you would expect.
I would expect no responses or upvotes if nobody agrees.
But I understand what you are saying. You think downvotes should be used to express disagreement, just like upvotes are used to express agreement.
Then you're completely irrational, and there's really nothing else to say.
I'm the irrational one? Ok... :)
Cu around.
Never once said or implied this.
Well if you would have stuck around, maybe we would have had what is called a normal conversation where two people talk and learn something.
There's nothing to discuss. You think that being openly antagonistic about the subject of a sub doesn't warrant rebuke. It's not a rational position.
Except that's not what you have done here.