this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
391 points (99.5% liked)

196

16458 readers
2741 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

your snide condescension isn't persuasive

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you open to being persuaded?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yes, but I am also highly skeptical, so you'd need proof, not rhetoric.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which, as they said, are readily available if you actually wanted to learn.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've looked and I don't find the facts support the claim above, but maybe there are facts I haven't found

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

all four of those are just rehashing the poore nemecek paper and editorializing without the rigor of peer review. they are extrapolating far beyond the scope of the actual article and drawing conclusions that are not justified in teh paper itself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Animal agriculture uses a disproportionately large portion of habitable land per calorie (or gram of protein even) https://ourworldindata.org/land-use

The top drivers of deforestation are beef production and soy (70-75% of which is used for animal feed) https://www.worldwildlife.org/magazine/issues/summer-2018/articles/what-are-the-biggest-drivers-of-tropical-deforestation

Animal agriculture is a main driver of antibiotic resistant strains if bacteria, something the WHO calls “an increasingly serious threat to global public health that requires action across all government sectors and society.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638249/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that doesn't show that cutting out meat for my diet would have any impact at all. You're just talking about impacts the industry has. I already understand the industry has impacts. I'm saying that my diet doesn't change that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a bad faith argument then. You're saying:

  1. The only thing that would convince you is an impossible to test hypothetical.

  2. You understand the industry causes severe environmental damage, but you'll continue to support that same industry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't made any arguments at all. I just don't believe things without proof.