this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
1159 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

11243 readers
3155 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1159
Why there are no time travelers. (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nieceandtows 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don’t remember the name of the novel, so somebody help me with this. The concept is basically that scientists invent time travel, but use it as a teleportation device instead. Set the machine by a few seconds, you teleport the distance covered by the Earth during that time. They even use the technique to plan for an assasination of Kim Jong Un. Loved that one. Some innovative sequences using the ‘time machine’.

Edit: Found it. It's actually two books (original and sequel).

Split Second - https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26216031-split-second

and

Time Frame - https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37946554-time-frame

The first book takes its time revealing the 'time travel', but the second book dives head first into using the technology proficiently.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Accidentally read the second book thinking it was a stand alone. The story still held up so i made it half the book before i realized my mistake

[–] nieceandtows 6 points 1 year ago

It’s actually marketed as a standalone sequel, so you weren’t too far off. Plus I think the first one was more of an action thriller than about this invention. I actually don’t remember much from the first one. Most of what I remember is from the second one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I hope there is an audiobook of these, sounds right up my alley