this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
61 points (98.4% liked)

Memes

45641 readers
1392 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That teacher should be fired How can they be allowed to teach and fuck that up

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

90% of these are faked for Internet points. Just like 99% of text message screenshots.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No point in anything, man.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly! The answer the kid gave is the "correct" one because it shows a proper reasoning about fractions. While the teachers logic assumes that fractions are some kind of absolute value of measure???

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what annoys me with marking that as wrong. The kid clearly understood the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Teacher doesn’t know there’s more than one size of pizza I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The teacher's from another timeline where the "pizza" made it into SI as the standard unit of food area.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is one of those problems that makes more sense with context. The teacher had the students working on "reasonableness", which is essentially "does the question I'm asking make sense?". The students were probably instructed to ignore actually trying to solve the problem when presented with one, but instead explain why the question either does or doesn't make sense.

In this case the student potentially misunderstood the task. The failure on the teacher's part is wording the question in such a way that it actually has a reasonable solution, and isn't necessarily an unreasonable question.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The feedback should look totally different if that was the case though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The teacher doesn't need to write all of that to get the point across. They can speak to them on the side and say, "remember when we worked on reasonableness last Tuesday?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I’m a teacher myself so I fully get how that can be done. But the written feedback is still very, very off if the assignement is what you said it is.

Honestly looks way more like a teacher who is a bit to rigged in their thinking and just got it wrong. I know plenty of those!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn’t testing reasonableness. This is testing to see if a student understands that to properly compare fractions the wholes have to start as equivalent.

Source: I use questions similar to this every year because if I don’t get some real funky diagrams.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But.. you can totally compare fractions without the whole being equivalent. You just have to know the size of the wholes. It's just a poorly phrased question that has more than one correct answer when only one was intended.

Edit: also, it's totally testing reasonableness, that's literally the title of the question. Still poorly phrased though.