this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
275 points (100.0% liked)

urbanism

22307 readers
1 users here now

This was supposed to be c/traingang, so post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Trainposts highly encouraged

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

actually unpopular opinion: you shouldn't be able to own more than one house

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should be given one house and be allowed to own one second property for personal use.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can concede this point, but only if dachas are things almost or absolutely everyone has. Soviets did have a pretty good system for it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's what I thought the second property for personal use was!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

multiple people can use it at different types of the year perhaps? I'd hate for a house to go to waste for most of the time.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I'll be there every weekend. People can come over while I'm grilling. grillman

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This sounds good

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

We did have a micro struggle session once here whether if even owning your own singular house was petit bourgeois (one poster saying the state or collective should own it)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think at a certain point of communism whether you "own" your home or whether it's technically owned by the Housing committee with full rights devolved to you while you live there is irrelevant. The only real risk is of the collective going Home Owners Association on you because you keep a tin boat in the front yard or something.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty much what I said in the thread that under communism eventually you'd start to resolve the contradictions between renting and owning a house and hopefully end up with the positives of owning your house (lifetime security, being able to modify it) with the (few) positives of renting (not being responsible for unexpected repairs and being able to dispose of the housing if you want to move to another city etc).

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

one poster saying the state or collective should own it.

Lmao some people on here are unreal. "Well in my imagined perfect succesful communist utopia, this is how things should be, so since you're not doing that now, you're a reactionairy"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The analogy I use is going on a road trip from NY to LA, and getting in a fight over which LA restaurant to stop at before you've even left NY state

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Great analogy!