this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
461 points (91.4% liked)

Atheism

3970 readers
1 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

anti-religious enlightened atheist garbage is some of the worst content out there

Really? Pedantry is as bad as fatwas and religiously motivated killings?

How quaint.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

since when are religiously motivated killings “content”? same goes for fatwas. obviously i was referring to online content, specifically the trash found here and on /r/atheism

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Define "trash". I suspect your definition is equally quaint.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

while you’re defining quaint, have a go at defining “content” and make sure it includes fatwas and religious killings, since you consider those to be content.

or perhaps you’re just circlejerking with the other antitheists here and it doesn’t matter as long as God bad Science good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

or perhaps you’re just circlejerking with the other antitheists here and it doesn’t matter as long as God bad Science good.

Maybe. But given that we're not wrong, I don't care if you're offended.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

can you define quaint? bc it doesn’t seem like your intention lines up with its meaning

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm being facetious. Believers like you complaining about atheists while enjoying a position of privilege are perfect targets for mockery.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The person started by saying they were not religious. Feels like you're just looking to offend some religious people... on an atheist community. Kinda proving their point there bud.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

exactly my point. the atheism subreddit used to be exactly like this too. it’s chock full of anti-religious circlejerkers that want nothing but to own believers and it’s just pure brainrot.

but that’s my problem with the current state of lemmy in general. it seems like there’s a lot of reactionary bullshit and no actual discussion. people will just assume that you believe certain things if you disagree with what they’re saying.