this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
268 points (96.5% liked)

Facepalm

2636 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"couldn't afford not to?" guarantee the restaurant was losing money by staying open to serve those customers. The hourly wage of the waiters, cooks, dishwashers, everyone except maybe the hostess, is all going to cost more than anything a single table could possibly order

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not every restaurant is a corporate chain restaurant there and no, we couldn't afford to turn these customers away.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

If you think about it, corporate chain restaurants are much less likely to lose money on that than small individual places, everything in a corporate chain is cheap and designed for efficiency. If a small, locally-owned place is gonna stay open an extra hour for one table, they're practically guaranteed to lose more money than a corporate chain.