Technology

37717 readers

525 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

464

Jitsi, the open-source video conferencing platform, now requires a Google, Microsoft, or Facebook account for their online service (jitsi.org)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

104 comments fedilink hide all child comments

While Jitsi is open-source, most people use the platform they provide, meet.jit.si, for immediate conference calls. They have now introduced a "Know Your Customer" policy and require at least one of the attendees to log in with a Facebook, Github (Microsoft), or Google account.

One option to avoid this is to self-host, but then you'll be identifiable via your domain and have to maintain a server.

As a true alternative to Jitsi, there's jami.net. It is a decentralized conference app, free open-source, and account creation is optional. It's available for all major platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), including on F-Droid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If its open-source, couldn't somebody just fork it and remove the login requirement?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can self host it as well. This is just a restriction of the online service - the problem being that most people are not going to self-host their conference calls.

[–] mark 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah they'd have to maintain upgrades security patches etc and could get pricey depending on how much storage and bandwidth is involved.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Come on, one more step and you'll get to the part where you have to deal with preventing other people from using your instance for child porn.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Or you could just restrict it for use by a select few you know.