Sysadmin

5583 readers

1 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Oracle and SuSE responds to IBM (www.oracle.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Kind of finally. SuSE https://www.suse.com/news/SUSE-Preserves-Choice-in-Enterprise-Linux/

So... I think this is kind of the worst case scenario re SuSE - an actual fork. But Oracle kind of hints at that, and Amazon already dropped a RHEL compatible AWS Linux for sort of a Fedora Server?

Obviously none of this is great, but would anyone really want Oracle leading a RHEL "close as possible" rebuild? I don't know anyone is going to downstream them.

SuSE is even weirder, as I understand it, SLE/OpenSuSE is a fork from decades ago, or at least also uses RPM? I can't imagine they get any value from trying to make a RHEL fork really... Why not push SLE? All very confusing, that's for sure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm willing to give the other offerings a chance. If RHEL wants to abandon the community and become "just another software company", then I'm happy to treat them as such. I'll entertain the market finding where the new standard can be.