this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
132 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
207 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So far it doesn't look like he's getting away with it. Ad revenue is down 60% compared to last year, it doesn't look like there is enough revenue from subscriptions to make up for that, and they're being evicted from one of their offices.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

No, but the users still keep using it and the bigger advertisers are coming back. It’ll get sold off but love on. Too many people unwilling to let go.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

they're being evicted from one of their offices.

That story is (unfortunately) not as bad as it sounds on the surface. Basically the office they're being evicted from was leased just as COVID lockdowns were happening and WFH became a thing. So no one was actually working there and it was pretty much just sitting empty. It's still not great, but Twitter isn't really losing anything of value.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see. Maybe one of the offices they're actually using and also not paying the rent on next? A man can dream.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Whether or not they actually used the office, they still owed rent, did they not?