this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
70 points (97.3% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5234 readers
21 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following up on an paper posted earlier this week on disproportionate carbon emissions based on income. This article, by one of the paper's authors, proposes the possibility of imposing carbon tax on investment income as a more equitable means of influencing emissions.

Instead of putting the responsibility for cutting emissions on consumers, maybe policies should more directly tie that responsibility to corporate executives, board members, and investors who have the most knowledge and power over their industries. Based on our analysis of the consumption and income benefits produced by greenhouse gas emissions, I believe a shareholder-based carbon tax is worth exploring.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This seems very interesting. Could you give a definition of producer and suplier ?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Updated the article link (had to remove the image)

From the article:

"Producer" and "supplier" reflect two different ways to calculate emissions from investments.

The "supplier" column includes emissions along the investment's supply chain, while "producer" is only emissions connected to operations.

In short, looking at emissions using the supplier methodology is more inclusive but may result in double-counting.