this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
289 points (98.7% liked)

News

23014 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman who mailed then-President Trump a threatening letter that contained ricin weeks before the 2020 election was sentenced to 262 months in prison on Thursday, the Department of Justice announced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That kind of sick slavery apologia is why we reject that kind of “ends never justify the means” moral outlook and why we look at the reality of a situation before passing judgement.

I know you're running hot after that one, but - didn't you mean "we reject ... ends ~~never~~ justify the means"?

Wait no, I just read back the thread again. You're saying that Sherman's march was justified, because it was pivotal in ending the Civil War with a Union win, and by extension, ending slavery in the US.

No. Sherman's march was not justified. It was horrible and cruel. When he decided to do it, and continue it, he lacked the hindsight that we enjoy. He could make some shorter term predictions, but nothing like being certain that it was necessary to end the war.

"But if it hadn't happened, or had failed, then the war may have turned out another way." That's an absurd thought experiment, because it didn't happen any other way. There is no "if."

The march happened, it was bad, historians now (with the benefit of hindsight) can point to the effects it did have (and historians don't always agree on everything or have complete and accurate information), the North won, slavery ended, which was good.

If the future ends justify the present means, that is license for anyone to do anything, with a clear conscience. And you never ever have to get to the stated end, even if it is your sincere belief, and even if your belief is in an empirically good thing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know you’re running hot after that one, but -

We can soundly dismiss you based on the tone policing alone. Bye

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That first part, before "Wait no," was the entirety of my initial comment. I was trying to be kind with what I thought was a correction.

And then I realized you actually meant that - that the ends justify the means. Which I firmly and wholly disagree with, for the reasons I explained above.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are arguing with someone who by all outward appearances is psychotic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not even really arguing, per se. But when someone is so wrong about something as critically important as the concept of "ends justifying means," I cannot let it stand without prompt and thorough comment. It is my civic duty to reply, if not for the person I am replying to, then for the passers-by who may be reading.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago