this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
1585 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
1573 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

no, fuck murder.

Don't get me wrong, fuck poachers, but murder is never the solution, it just breeds escalated violence.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Actually they tried the normal way, where they didn't shoot and asked the poachers to surrender / tried to arrest them. But the rangers would get shot and the animals would continue to get poached.

Seeing this as a problem, a new executive order / law was passed allowing shoot at sight orders at national parks / protected zones.

Poaching has reduced, the number of rangers getting shot has reduced. The number of poachers getting shot has reduced (they don't wanna fuck around anymore).

Overall it has increased peace.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Murder is bad, but humans are the problem. And humans being stupid chaotic creatures, it often devolves in to dirty things like killing. You can say all you want about right and wrong but this is a messy situation and this is the solution they have been forced in to using, after trying the peaceful method for years

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not murder, it's legal punishment. The poachers use gun violence against rangers, so it's a reasonable escalation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It clearly says “on sight”

You don’t want to wait for them to shoot first, you just want to murder them.

No society on earth considers shooting on sight to be legal punishment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Endangered-animal lives are much more precious to me than humans-who-are-willing-to-murder-endangered-animals lives, so I disagree.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I am more alluding to the risk of collateral

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a great way to gun down any random civilian without proof of any wrongdoing. Just say they were poaching!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's not how it works. Random citizens don't traipse around the bush hunting for rhinos and elephants and such.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

That's a terrible and quite frankly untrue take